Routes to the Senate Floor: Rule XIV and Unanimous Consent







Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress



Most bills and joint resolutions introduced in the Senate, and many House-numbered bills and
joint resolutions received by the Senate after House passage, are referred to committee. Senate
Rule XIV and unanimous consent, however, allow the Senate to bypass a measure’s referral to
committee. This report examines the framework of these alternatives. (Concurrent and simple
resolutions are not covered by this report.) This report will not be updated unless Senate
procedures change.





hen a Senator introduces a bill or joint resolution, the measure is often referred to
committee, pursuant to provisions of Senate Rules XIV, XVII, and XXV. When the
House informs the Senate that it has passed a bill or joint resolution that was 1W


introduced in that chamber, the measure is also often similarly referred to a Senate committee.
Senate Rule XIV, para. 2 requires that bills and resolutions have three readings before passage, 2
and that they be read twice before being referred to committee. Although a Senator may demand
that the readings occur on three different legislative days under paragraph 2, bills and joint
resolutions may be read twice on the same day “for reference” (referral) if there is no objection
(Rule XIV, para. 3). Most bills and resolutions are read twice (understood in practice to occur by
unanimous consent) and referred to committee on the same day that they are introduced by a 3
Senator or received from the House.
Senate Rule XVII, para. 1 states that a measure should be referred to the committee “which has
jurisdiction over the subject matter which predominates....” Rule XXV contains the jurisdictions
of the Senate’s standing committees. There also exist agreements between committees that might
govern the referral of certain bills and joint resolutions. Under Rule XVII, para. 1, the presiding
officer formally refers bills and joint resolutions; practically, the parliamentarian refers measures 4
in behalf of the presiding officer. The introduction and referral of bills and joint resolutions, and
the referral of House-passed bills and joint resolutions, occurs as “morning business,” pursuant to 5
Senate Rule VII, para. 1.
The Senate may, however, use provisions of Senate Rule XIV or unanimous consent to
completely or partially bypass potential referral of a bill or joint resolution to a Senate committee.
The purpose of doing so could be to have a measure placed directly on the Senate’s Calendar of
Business, which under General Orders lists measures eligible for floor consideration, or to
immediately consider a measure.

1 Senate rules contain procedures for the processing of concurrent and simple resolutions, which are not covered in this
report. See especially Senate Rule XIV, para. 6.
2 The “third reading” occurs after Senate consideration of a measure and before the vote on final passage. See U.S.
Congress, Senate, Riddicks Senate Procedure, S.Doc. 101-28, 101st Cong., 2nd sess. (Washington: GPO, 1992), pp.
1290-1291 (hereafter Riddicks Senate Procedure).
3 For example, on Feb. 14, 2007, Senate bills S. 579 - S. 601 were introduced. The Congressional Record entry stated:
The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the first and second times by unanimous consent, and
referred as indicated.”Introduction of Bills and Joint Resolutions, Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 153,
Feb. 14, 2007, p. S1958.
On Sept. 30, 2005, the Senate received a message from the House that the House had passed H.R. 3824, “in which it
requests the concurrence of the Senate[.] A Congressional Record entry stated: “The following bill was read the first
and second times by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated. “Message from the House” and “Measures
Referred,Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 151, Sept. 30, 2005, p. S10796.
4 Rule XVII, para. 3 allows a measure to be referred to more than one committee, jointly or sequentially, by motion of
the majority and minority leaders; this procedure has not been used. Joint and sequential referrals, however, have been
made by unanimous consent.
5 This rule (para. 6) also allows the introduction of such measures by delivery to the presiding officer’s desk, “in the
absence of objection.” In addition, in a unanimous consent request similar to ones in previous Congresses, the Senate th
permitted, “...that for the duration of the 110 Congress, Senators may be allowed to bring to the desk bills, joint
resolutions, concurrent resolutions, and simple resolutions, for referral to appropriate committees.” Senator Harry Reid,
remarks in the Senate, “Unanimous-Consent Agreement,” Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 153, Jan. 4, 2007,
p. S8.



This report examines the framework and use of Rule XIV and unanimous consent to place bills
and joint resolutions directly on the calendar. In the remainder of this report, “bill” or “bills” will
be used to refer to bill(s) and joint resolution(s).
Senate Rule XIV, para. 4, states: “... and every bill and joint resolution introduced on leave, and
every bill and joint resolution of the House of Representatives which shall have received a first
and second reading without being referred to a committee, shall, if objection be made to further
proceeding thereon, be placed on the Calendar.” (Emphasis added.)
Therefore, through objection, a bill after two readings is prevented from being referred to
committee and is placed directly on the calendar. It is usually the majority leader, or his designee,
acting on his own or at the request of any other Senator, who objects to “further proceeding”—6
committee referral—on the measure.
For example, this procedure was used to place directly on the calendar S. 287. On January 12,
2007, while the Senate was debating another measure, the presiding officer recognized the
majority leader for this colloquy:
Mr. REID. I understand S. 287, introduced earlier today by Senator Kennedy and others, is at
the desk. I ask for its first reading.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
(A bill (S. 287) to prohibit the use of funds for an escalation of United States military forces
in Iraq above the numbers existing as of January 9, 2007.)
Mr. REID. I now ask for its second reading but object to my own request.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard. The bill will receive its second reading on 7
the next legislative day.
In the next edition of the calendar on January 16, this action was recorded in the section Bills and
Joint Resolutions Read the First Time. The measure was held at the desk.
Since objection had been heard to the second reading, the presiding officer recognized Senator
Ken Salazar, the majority leader’s designee, the next legislative day, January 16, during the
Senate’s conduct of morning business:
Mr. SALAZAR. Mr. President, I understand S. 287 is at the desk and due for a second
reading.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator is correct. The clerk will state the bill by title.

6 See also Riddick’s Senate Procedure, pp. 225-226, 240-248.
7 Senator Harry Reid, remarks in the Senate, “Measure Read the First TimeS. 287,” Congressional Record, daily
edition, vol. 153, Jan. 12, 2007, p. S503.





(The legislative clerk read as follows: A bill (S. 287) to prohibit the use of funds for an
escalation of United States military forces in Iraq above the numbers existing as of January
9, 2007.)
Mr. SALAZAR. Mr. President, I object to any further proceeding with respect to the bill [in
order to place it on the calendar under the provisions of rule XIV].
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Objection is heard. The bill will be placed on the calendar.8
S. 287 had received its second reading, but there was objection to further proceeding on it. The
presiding officer, under Rule XIV, ordered that the bill be placed on the Senate Calendar. In the
calendar beginning January 17, S. 287 appeared in the section General Orders, with other
measures available for floor consideration.
This same procedure is followed to have House-passed bills placed directly on the Senate 9
Calendar.
Broadly, the two purposes of preventing referral of a bill to a committee are: (1) to facilitate the
full Senate’s opportunity to consider the measure; or (2) to bypass a committee’s potential 10
inaction or, to the sponsor, potential hostile action. While placing a bill directly on the calendar
does not guarantee that the full Senate will ever consider it, the measure is available for floor
consideration and certain procedural steps, like committee reporting, and procedural
requirements, like the two-day availability of a committee report, may be obviated.
In the 109th Congress, at least 119 bills were placed directly on the calendar using the Rule XIV 11
procedure. For example, S. 397, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, was an
important legislative initiative. A reason that it might have been placed directly on the calendar th
was that the full Senate already considered a related bill in the 108 Congress. In September
2005, 11 Senate bills dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina were placed directly on the
calendar, thereby allowing the majority leader to expeditiously call them up for consideration by
the Senate.
House-passed bills might also be placed directly on the Calender using the Rule XIV procedure
when a Senate measure is already on the calendar, an amendment to the House measure is already
in discussion among interested Senators, support for the House-passed measure is stronger in the
full Senate than in the committee to which it would be referred, or for another reason. House-th
passed measures placed on the calendar in this way in the 109 Congress included H.R. 8, Death
Tax Repeal Permanency Act; H.R. 810, Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; and H.R. 2745,
United Nations Reform Act.

8 Senator Ken Salazar, remarks in the Senate, “Measure Placed on the Calendar—S. 287,Congressional Record, daily
edition, vol. 153, Jan. 16, 2007, p. S628.
9 See, for example, the legislative history of H.R. 6 (110th Cong.), CLEAN Energy Act of 2007.
10 On occasion, a Senator introduces a bill, which is referred to committee, and later introduces an identical or similar
measure and places it directly on the calendar under Rule XIV. The Senator might do this to bypass a committee’s
hostility to the first measure. Alternately, a Senator can seek to offer a measure as an amendment to another measure.
See CRS Report 98-707, Senate Amendment Process: General Conditions and Principles, by Walter J. Oleszek.
11 These 119 measures were identified by a search of the Congressional Record on the Legislative Information System.
Such a search of the 108th Congress identified 114 measures.





The procedure under Rule XIV is also used by the minority party, or a Senator with a viewpoint
different on an issue from that of other Senators, to give added visibility to specific bills and to th
avoid potential inaction or hostility in a Senate committee. Democratic Senators in the 109
Congress, for example, used this procedure to put bills such as S. 1062, Fair Minimum Wage Act
of 2005, directly on the calendar.
Bills may also be read the first and second times by unanimous consent and placed on the th
calendar. This procedure was used in the 109 Congress for House-passed bills such as H.R. 3,
the highway and transit bill. The Senate’s transportation bill was reported from Senate committee
shortly after the Senate received the House-passed measure.
The majority leader seeks unanimous consent to expeditiously process legislation. The Senate
uses a practice called “clearance” to notify Senators of pending noncontroversial bills to
determine if any Senator would object to passing a specific measure by unanimous consent, with 12
little or no debate. The process of passing noncontroversial measures may include bypassing a
Senate committee or truncating committee action, although a committee might well have played a
key role in the development of the noncontroversial measure sought to be passed or in its
clearance.
The Senate may pass some noncontroversial bills the day they are introduced, for example, in the th

109 Congress, S. 1752, reauthorizing the United States Grain Standards Act:


Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate
consideration of S. 1752, introduced earlier today.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
A bill (S. 1752) to amend the United States Grain Standards Act to reauthorize that Act.
There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the bill be read a third time and
passed, the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, and that any statements relating to
the bill be printed in the RECORD.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

12 Measures are usually taken up during the time for morning business (in a period dubbed thewrap-up period”), but
also during the conduct of legislative business, when a unanimous consent order temporarily suspends, in effect, the
business under consideration by the Senate.





The bill (S. 1752) was read the third time and passed, as follows:
(The text of the bill was printed in the Congressional Record.)13
The Senate may also pass some noncontroversial House-passed bills when they are received. For
example, the Senate received a message from the House July 19, 2005, regarding H.R. 3332, and
passed the bill that day:
Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the Senate proceed to the immediate
consideration of H.R. 3332 received from the House.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk will report the bill
by title.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
A bill (H.R. 3332) to provide an extension of highway, highway safety, motor carrier safety,
transit, and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund pending enactment of a st
law reauthorizing the Transportation Equity Act for the 21 century.
There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the bill be read the third time and
passed, the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, and any statements be printed in the
RECORD.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The bill (H.R. 3332) was read the third time and passed.14
The Senate might anticipate passage of a measure by the House, and agree by unanimous consent th
to Senate passage. For example, the Senate in the 109 Congress anticipated House passage of
H.R. 241, following the Indian Ocean tsunami:
Mr. McCONNELL. I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate receives from the House
H.R. 241, the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration, that the bill be read three times,
passed, and the motion to reconsider be laid on the table without intervening action or
debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.15

13 Senator Bill Frist, remarks in the Senate, “Amending the United States Grain Standards Act,” Congressional Record,
daily edition, vol. 151, Sept. 22, 2005, p. S10392. A bill or joint resolution might also be held at the desk by unanimous
consent pending later action.
14 Senator Bill Frist, remarks in the Senate, “Providing Extension of Programs Funded out of the Highway Trust Fund,”
Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 151, July 19, 2005, p. S8499.
15 Senator Mitch McConnell, remarks in the Senate, “Unanimous Consent Agreement—H.R. 241,” Congressional
Record, daily edition, vol. 151, Jan. 6, 2005, p. S41. See also Riddick’s Senate Procedure, pp. 230-231.





Noncontroversial Senate bills and House-passed measures are often referred to committee. A
committee might later be discharged from a measure’s consideration. For example, S. 1613,
Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act amendments, was introduced September 6, 2005, and
referred to the Agriculture Committee, which seven days later was discharged from its
consideration:
Mr. FRIST. I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Agriculture be discharged from
further consideration of S. 1613 and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk will report the bill
by title.
The assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
A bill (S. 1613) to amend the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 to extend the
termination date for mandatory price reporting.
There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the bill.
Mr. FRIST. I ask unanimous consent that the bill be read a third time and passed, the motion
to reconsider be laid upon the table, and any statements relating to the measure be printed in
the RECORD.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The bill (S. 1613) was read the third time and passed, as follows:
(The text of the bill was printed in the Congressional Record.)16
Several House-passed bills naming postal facilities were referred to the Homeland Security and th
Governmental Affairs Committee early in the 109 Congress, which the committee ordered
reported. The committee was subsequently discharged from further consideration of the 17
measures, ending committee action before the bills were reported.
Michael L. Koempel
Senior Specialist in American National Government
mkoempel@crs.loc.gov, 7-0165




16 Senator Bill Frist, remarks in the Senate, “Amending Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999,” Congressional
Record, daily edition, vol. 151, Sept. 13, 2005, p. S9995.
17 See, for example, the legislative history of H.R. 120 (109th Cong.), a bill naming a U.S. Postal Service facility for
former Rep. Dalip Singh Saund.