House Committee Funding, 110th Congress






Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress



Pursuant to House Rule X, clause 6, the House Administration Committee reports an omnibus,
biennial “primary expense resolution” to cover the expenses of each standing and select
committee (except the Appropriations Committee). The resolution is based in part on committee
requests for funds to cover necessary expenses for the two years of a Congress. On March 8,

2007, the House adopted H.Res. 202, providing for the expenses of certain committees of the th


House of Representatives in the 110 Congress by a vote of 269 to 150.
This report summarizes requests from individual committees and funding levels reported by the th
Committee on House Administration, and compares 110 Congress-authorized levels to th
authorizations for House committees in the 109 Congress. CRS Report RL32794, House thth
Committee Funding Requests and Authorizations, 104-110 Congresses, by R. Eric Petersen,
provides historical and analytical data on funding requests and authorizations for House
committees since 1995.





ursuant to House Rule X, clause 6, the House Administration Committee reports an
omnibus, biennial “primary expense resolution” to cover the expenses of each standing and 1
select committee (except the Appropriations Committee). The resolution is based in part P


on committee requests for funds to cover their necessary expenses for the two years of a
Congress. On March 8, 2007, the House adopted H.Res. 202, providing for the expenses of th
certain committees of the House of Representatives in the 110 Congress by a vote of 269 to 150.
On March 7, 2007, the Committee on Rules met to consider a rule governing House debate on 2
H.Res. 202. Under the rule, an amendment to H.Res. 202, creating a Select Committee on
Energy Independence and Global Warming, and specifying the panel’s composition, jurisdiction, 3
procedure, funding, and termination date, is to be considered to be automatically adopted.
On March 1, 2007, the Committee on House Administration met to mark up H.Res. 202.
Representative Juanita Millender-McDonald, who is chairwoman of the panel, offered an
amendment in the nature of a substitute to the measure, which was adopted by voice vote. The
panel then reported H.Res. 202, as amended, to the House by voice vote.
The Committee on House Administration held a hearing on committee expense requests on
February 28, 2007. Representative Millender-McDonald indicated that, under the provisions of a
year-long continuing resolution funding FY2007 House operations at FY2006 levels, plus an
increase for inflation, most panel budgets would likely receive authorizations for increases of not th
more than 2.4% over funding levels authorized for the second session of the 109 Congress. She
said that if more funding becomes available in FY2008, the committee might revisit 4
authorizations for the second session.
During the hearings the chairwoman and the ranking minority member, Representative Vernon
Ehlers, reiterated the longstanding expectation that committee resources would reflect a
distribution of 2/3 of committee staff to the majority, and 1/3 to the minority, and a similar 5
distribution of non-staff resources. In their testimony, most committee chairs and ranking

1 P.L. 79-601, Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, Section 202(b), 60 Stat. 834, grants the Committee on
Appropriations authorization to appropriate funds for its own activities.
2 H.Res. 219, Providing for consideration of the resolution (H.Res. 202) providing for the expenses of certain
committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Tenth Congress, reported by the Committee on Rules,
March 7, 2007.
3 The text of the amendment creating the new select committee is available in the report to accompany H.Res. 219. See
U.S. House, Providing for Consideration of the Resolution (H.Res. 202) Providing for the Expenses of Certain thst
Committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Tenth Congress, H.Rept. 110-034, 110 Cong., 1
sess., March 7, 2007 (Washington: GPO, 2007), pp. 3-4.
4 Oral comments of Representative Juanita Millender-McDonald at the hearing of the Committee on House
Administration on committee funding, February 28, 2007.
5 Between 1995 and 2005, House majority leadership encouraged its committee leaders to provide the minority with
one-third of committee staff and resources authorized in the biennial funding resolutions. Statements made by leaders th
of the House Administration Committee at the beginning of its committee funding review for the 107 Congress, and th
reaffirmed at the beginning of the 108 Congress, indicated a consensus that all House committees should provide at th
least one-third minority staffing in those Congresses. In the 109 Congress, the 2/3-1/3 distribution of staff was
reaffirmed by the chair and ranking member of the Committee on House Administration, but some testimony by
ranking members urged provision of 1/3 of non-staff resources to the minority. In addition, some questions regarding
the extent of control the minority might exercise over those resources were raised. In its report to accompany H.Res. th
224 (109 Congress),the Committee on House Administration said that it “feels it is the prerogative of the Chairman to
maintain control over the committee budget, as the chairman is ultimately responsible for all expenditures obligated by
the committee. In the course of the February 28, 2007, hearings on committee funding, Chairwoman Millender-
(continued...)



members acknowledged mutually satisfactory arrangements had been reached regarding the 6
distribution of committee staff and other expenses.
Table 1 summarizes requests from individual committees and funding levels authorized by the ththth
House for the 110 Congress. Table 2 compares authorized levels for the 110 and 109 7
Congresses. CRS Report RL32794, House Committee Funding Requests and Authorizations, thth
104-110 Congresses, by R. Eric Petersen, provides historical and analytical data on funding
requests and authorizations for House committees since 1995.

(...continued)
McDonald orally affirmed the policy establishing the chair as the official with ultimate responsibility for committee
resources.
See Gabriel Kahn,Panels Ask Oversight to Slash Own Budgets,Roll Call, February 27, 1995; Juliet Eilperin and
Gabriel Kahn, “Houses Chief Officer UnveilsDream Team, Roll Call, March 9, 1995, retrieved through nexis.com; thst
U.S. House, Committee on House Administration, Hearing on Committee Funding Requests, 108 Cong., 1 sess.
(Washington: GPO, 2003), p. 2-3, available at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname
=108_house_hearings&docid=f:89055.pdf; U.S. House, Committee on House Administration, Committee Funding, thst
109 Cong., 1 sess. (Washington: GPO, 2005), pp. 4-6, 41-47, and 64-75, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/
getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_house_hearings&docid=f:20927.pdf; U.S. House, Providing for the Expenses of Certain thst
Committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Ninth Congress, H.Rept. 109-54, 109 Cong., 1
sess., April 26, 2005 (Washington: GPO, 2005), quote, p. 7, available at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/
getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_reports&docid=f:hr054.109.pdf].
6 In his written opening statement, Representative Ehlers noted that adjustments to the 2/3-1/3 budget allocation have
been made in the past, for instance through the use of shared staff, or a centrally managed budget for non-personnel
expenditures.” See Committee on House Administration, Republican Office, “Opening Statement of Ranking Member
Vernon J. Ehlers,” February 28, 2007. In their testimony, some committee chairs and ranking members indicated that
they had reached agreement for a strict 2/3-1/3 distribution of resources while others acknowledged mutually agreeable
alternatives that provided the minority with resources for staff and other expenses.
7 In the 109th Congress, the Committee on Education and Labor was known as the Committee on Education and the
Workforce; the Committee on Foreign Affairs was known as the Committee on International Relations; the Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform was known as the Committee on Government Reform; and the Committee on
Science and Technology was known as the Committee on Science.




Table 1. House Committee Funding Requests, and Authorized Levels, 110th Congress
Requested Approved Difference Between Requested & Approved
Committee
Total 1st Session 2nd Session Total 1st Session 2nd Session Amount % of Request
Agriculture $12,398,755 $5,954,462 $6,444,293 $11,995,306 $5,910,765 $6,084,541 -$403,449 -3.25%
Armed Services $15,469,004 $6,883,959 $8,585,045 $14,618,946 $7,203,581 $7,415,366 -$850,058 -5.50%
Budget $12,026,478 $6,013,239 $6,013,239 $12,520,064 $6,169,343 $6,350,721 $493,586 4.10%
Education and Labor $16,334,250 $8,025,500 $8,308,750 $16,213,840 $7,989,475 $8,224,365 -$120,410 -0.74%
Energy and Commerce $22,474,614 $11,013,668 $11,460,946 $21,056,249 $10,375,603 $10,680,646 -$1,418,365 -6.31%
Financial Services $16,575,710 $8,029,517 $8,546,193 $16,189,138 $7,977,303 $8,211,835 -$386,572 -2.33%
Foreign Affairs $17,953,805 $8,762,228 $9,191,577 $17,391,504 $8,569,776 $8,821,728 -$562,301 -3.13%
iki/CRS-RS22616Homeland Security $16,511,877 $8,132,028 $8,379,849 $16,448,403 $8,105,057 $8,343,346 -$63,474 -0.38%
g/wHouse Administration $10,214,461 $5,033,242 $5,181,219 $10,214,461 $5,033,242 $5,181,219 $0 0.00%
s.or
leakJudiciary $16,657,587 $8,165,484 $8,492,103 $16,347,324 $8,055,250 $8,292,074 -$310,263 -1.86%
://wikiNatural Resources $15,581,951 $7,638,213 $7,943,738 $15,288,192 $7,533,355 $7,754,836 -$293,759 -1.89%
httpOversight and Government Reform $22,876,214 $10,790,667 $12,085,547 $21,602,950 $10,644,994 $10,957,956 -$1,273,264 -5.57%
Rules $6,781,540 $3,357,198 $3,424,342 $6,852,908 $3,376,815 $3,476,093 $71,368 1.05%
Science and Technology $13,209,820 $6,475,402 $6,734,418 $12,963,775 $6,387,984 $6,575,791 -$246,045 -1.86%
Small Business $6,257,410 $3,009,086 $3,248,324 $5,965,945 $2,939,758 $3,026,187 -$291,465 -4.66%
Standards of Official Conduct $6,119,301 $2,996,561 $3,122,740 $4,994,181 $2,460,915 $2,533,266 -$1,125,120 -18.39%
Transportation and Infrastructure $19,724,511 $9,528,749 $10,195,762 $19,261,795 $9,491,374 $9,770,421 -$462,716 -2.35%
Veterans’ Affairs $6,933,319 $3,398,686 $3,534,633 $7,076,347 $3,486,916 $3,589,431 $143,028 2.06%
Ways and Means $20,059,514 $9,785,129 $10,274,385 $19,040,609 $9,382,384 $9,658,226 -$1,018,905 -5.08%
Permanent Select Intelligence $10,409,000 $5,077,000 $5,332,000 $10,467,084 $5,157,724 $5,309,361 $58,086 0.56%
Select Energy Independence and Global Warming $3,725,467 $1,666,667 $2,058,800
Source: Data taken from individual committee funding resolutions introduced in the House for the 110th Congress and from H.Res. 202, as adopted by the House. U.S. thst
House, Providing for the Expenses of Certain Committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Tenth Congress, H.Rept. 110-29, 110 Cong., 1 sess., March 3, 2007




(Washington: GPO, 2007), p. 5. As shown on p. 5 of the committee report, the totals reported for individual committees do not always exactly equal the sum of the
amounts reported for each session.
Table 2. House Committee Funding Authorizations, 109th and 110th Congresses, Nominal Dollars
109th Congress 110th Congress Difference between 109th &110th Cong
Committee
Approved 1st Session 2nd Session Reported 1st Session 2nd Session Amount %
Agriculture $11,257,009 $5,495,805 $5,761,204 $11,995,306 $5,910,765 $6,084,541 $738,297 6.56%
Armed Services $12,826,208 $6,292,249 $6,533,959 $14,618,946 $7,203,581 $7,415,366 $1,792,738 13.98%
Budget $12,026,478 $6,013,239 $6,013,239 $12,520,064 $6,169,343 $6,350,721 $493,586 4.10%
Education and Labor $15,493,286 $7,705,970 $7,787,316 $16,213,840 $7,989,475 $8,224,365 $720,554 4.65%
Energy and Commerce $19,925,687 $9,812,619 $10,113,068 $21,056,249 $10,375,603 $10,680,646 $1,130,562 5.67%
Financial Services $15,203,100 $7,427,648 $7,775,452 $16,189,138 $7,977,303 $8,211,835 $986,038 6.49%
iki/CRS-RS22616Foreign Affairs $16,299,018 $7,946,084 $8,352,934 $17,391,504 $8,569,776 $8,821,728 $1,092,486 6.70%
g/wHomeland Security $14,000,000 $6,100,026 $7,899,974 $16,448,403 $8,105,057 $8,343,346 $2,448,403 17.49%
s.or
leakHouse Administration $9,554,568 $4,648,683 $4,905,885 $10,214,461 $5,033,242 $5,181,219 $659,893 6.91%
Judiciary $15,312,992 $7,461,565 $7,851,427 $16,347,324 $8,055,250 $8,292,074 $1,034,332 6.75%
://wikiNatural Resources $14,520,962 $7,178,224 $7,342,738 $15,288,192 $7,533,355 $7,754,836 $767,230 5.28%
http
Oversight and Government Reform $20,497,085 $10,121,443 $10,375,642 $21,602,950 $10,644,994 $10,957,956 $1,105,865 5.40%
Rules $6,365,600 $3,074,229 $3,291,371 $6,852,908 $3,376,815 $3,476,093 $487,308 7.66%
Science and Technology $12,327,996 $6,101,648 $6,226,348 $12,963,775 $6,387,984 $6,575,791 $635,779 5.16%
Small Business $5,586,973 $2,721,600 $2,865,373 $5,965,945 $2,939,758 $3,026,187 $378,972 6.78%
Standards of Official Conduct $4,290,536 $1,891,890 $2,398,646 $4,994,181 $2,460,915 $2,533,266 $703,645 16.40%
Transportation and Infrastructure $18,108,082 $8,856,869 $9,251,213 $19,261,795 $9,491,374 $9,770,421 $1,153,713 6.37%
Veterans’ Affairs $6,474,418 $3,075,732 $3,398,686 $7,076,347 $3,486,916 $3,589,431 $601,929 9.30%
Ways and Means $17,819,494 $8,674,514 $9,144,980 $19,040,610 $9,382,384 $9,658,226 $1,221,116 6.85%
Permanent Select Intelligence $9,527,870 $4,500,653 $5,027,217 $10,467,084 $5,157,724 $5,309,361 $939,214 9.86%
Select Energy Independence and Global Warming $3,725,467 $1,666,667 $2,058,800




Source: Data taken from H.Res. 224, 109th Congress; and H.Res. 202, 110th Congress, as adopted by the House. U.S. House, Providing for the Expenses of Certain Committees thst
of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Tenth Congress, H.Rept. 110-29, 110 Cong., 1 sess., March 3, 2007 (Washington: GPO, 2007), p. 5. As shown on p. 5 of
the committee report, the totals reported for individual committees do not always exactly equal the sum of the amounts reported for each session. In the 109th Congress,
the Committee on Education and Labor was known as the Committee on Education and the Workforce; the Committee on Foreign Affairs was known as the Committee
on International Relations; the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform was known as the Committee on Government Reform; and the Committee on Science
and Technology was known as the Committee on Science.


iki/CRS-RS22616
g/w
s.or
leak
://wiki
http



R. Eric Petersen
Analyst in American National Government
epetersen@crs.loc.gov, 7-0643