Marine Dead Zones: Understanding the Problem

Marine Dead Zones: Understanding the Problem
Updated August 13, 2007
Eugene H. Buck
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
Resources, Science, and Industry Division

Marine Dead Zones: Understanding the Problem
An adequate level of dissolved oxygen is necessary to support most forms of
aquatic life. While very low levels of dissolved oxygen (hypoxia) can be natural,
especially in deep ocean basins and fjords, hypoxia in coastal waters is mostly the
result of human activities that have modified landscapes or increased nutrients
entering these waters. Hypoxic areas are more widespread during the summer, when
algal blooms stimulated by spring runoff decompose to diminish oxygen. Such
hypoxic areas may drive out or kill animal life, and usually dissipate by winter. In
many places where hypoxia has occurred previously, it is now more severe and
longer lasting; in others where hypoxia did not exist historically, it now does, and
these areas are becoming more prevalent.
The largest hypoxic area affecting the United States is in the northern Gulf of
Mexico near the mouth of the Mississippi River, but there are others as well. Most
U.S. coastal estuaries and many developed nearshore areas suffer from varying
degrees of hypoxia, causing various environmental damages. Research has been
conducted to better identify the human activities that affect the intensity and duration
of, as well as the area affected by, hypoxic events, and to begin formulating control
Near the end of the 105th Congress, the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia
Research and Control Act of 1998 was signed into law as Title VI of P.L. 105-383.
Provisions of this act authorize appropriations through NOAA for research,
monitoring, education, and management activities to prevent, reduce, and control
hypoxia. Under this legislation, an integrated Gulf of Mexico hypoxia assessment
was completed in the late 1990s. In 2004, Title I of P.L. 108-456, the Harmful Algal
Bloom and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004, expanded this authority and
reauthorized appropriations through FY2008. Legislation has been introduced in theth
110 Congress to reauthorize and amend the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia
Research and Control Act.
As knowledge and understanding have increased concerning the possible
impacts of hypoxia, congressional interest in monitoring and addressing the problem
has grown. The issue of hypoxia is seen as a search for (1) increased scientific
knowledge and understanding of the phenomenon, as well as (2) cost-effective
actions that might diminish the size of hypoxic areas by changing practices that
promote their growth and development. This report presents an overview of the
causes of hypoxia, the U.S. areas of most concern, federal legislation, and relevant
federal research programs. This report will be updated as circumstances warrant.

Introduction and Background.........................................1
Hypoxic Areas....................................................2
Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone......................................4
Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone on Fishing.............8
Chesapeake Bay...............................................9
Oregon Coast.................................................9
Policy and Management Efforts......................................10
Appropriations and Funding....................................13
National Ocean Service....................................13
Department of Agriculture..................................13
Environmental Protection Agency............................13

Marine Dead Zones:
Understanding the Problem
Introduction and Background
Hypoxia refers to a depressed concentration of dissolved oxygen in water.
While definitions vary somewhat by region, it is generally agreed that hypoxia in a
marine environment occurs seasonally when dissolved oxygen levels fall below 2-3
milligrams per liter. Normal dissolved oxygen concentrations in nearshore marine
waters range between 5 and 8 milligrams per liter, and many fish species begin
having respiratory difficulties at concentrations below 5 milligrams per liter. In
extremely low oxygen environments, less tolerant marine animals cannot survive and1
either leave the area or die. Mortality is especially likely for sedentary species. In
addition, spawning areas and other essential habitat can be destroyed by the lack of
oxygen. If these conditions persist, a so-called “dead zone” may develop in which
little marine life exists.2 The recovery of marine ecosystems following a hypoxic
event has not been extensively studied.
Decreased concentrations of dissolved oxygen result in part from natural
eutrophication when nutrients (e.g., nitrogen and phosphorus) and sunlight stimulate
algal growth (e.g., algae, seaweed, and phytoplankton), increasing the amount of
organic matter in an aquatic ecosystem over decades and centuries. As organisms die
and sink to the bottom, they are consumed (decomposed) by oxygen-dependent
bacteria, depleting the water of oxygen. When this eutrophication is extensive and
persistent, bottom waters may become hypoxic, or even anoxic (no dissolved
oxygen), while surface waters can be completely normal and full of life. Hypoxia is
more likely to occur in coastal waters where the water column is stratified (i.e.,
layered) because of differences in temperature or salinity or both. Marine dead zones
become most noticeable when and where natural eutrophication has been accelerated
by human-influenced increases in nutrient loads.
Hypoxia often develops as a result of upwelled ocean waters, particularly along
the western coast of the Americas. In many instances, cool, nutrient-rich, deep
marine waters rise along the coastal margin and support massive algal blooms that
lead to hypoxia. In other instances, upwelled deep water is simply devoid of oxygen.
Eutrophication as a result of human activities usually results from non-point sources

1 Nancy N. Rabalais and R. E. Turner, eds., Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living
Resources and Ecosystems, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58 (Washington, DC: American
Geophysical Union, 2001), 454 pp.; Lisa A. Levin, “Oxygen Minimum Zone Benthos:
Adaptation and Community Response to Hypoxia,” Oceanography and Marine Biology: An
Annual Review, v. 41 (2003): 1-45.
2 Some molluscs and annelid worms are more tolerant of low oxygen conditions and can
survive hypoxic episodes that last many weeks.

of nutrients (e.g., runoff from lawns and various agricultural activities including
fertilizer use and livestock feedlots), point-source discharge from sewage plants, and
emissions from vehicles, power plants, and other industrial sources.
Hypoxic zones frequently occur in coastal areas where rivers enter the ocean
(e.g., estuaries). Rivers deliver fresh waters that are rich in nutrients to the saltier
estuaries and coastal oceans. The fresh water is less dense than the salt water and
typically flows across the top of the sea water. The fresh surface water effectively
caps the more dense, saline bottom waters, retarding mixing, creating a two-layer
system, and promoting hypoxia development in the lower, more saline waters. In the
northern Gulf of Mexico, the greatest algal growth in surface waters occurs about a
month after maximum river discharge, with hypoxic bottom water developing a
month later.3 Hypoxia is more likely to occur in estuaries with high nutrient loading
and low flushing (i.e., low freshwater turnover).4 Human activities that increase
nutrient loading can increase the intensity, spatial extent, and duration of hypoxic
events. Storms and tides may mix the hypoxic bottom water and the aerated surface
water, dissipating the hypoxia.
Although the extent of effects of hypoxic events on U.S. coastal ecosystems is
still uncertain, the phenomenon is of increasing concern in coastal areas. Several
federal agencies are involved in analyzing the problem, including the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Legislation was enacted by
the 105th Congress to provide additional authority and funding for research and
monitoring to address these concerns. This authority was extended by the 108th
Hypoxic Areas
Hypoxic episodes have been recorded in all parts of the world, notably in
partially enclosed seas and basins where vertical mixing is minimal, such as the Gulf
of Mexico, Chesapeake Bay, the New York Bight, the Baltic Sea, and the Adriatic
Sea. In March 2004, the U.N. Environment Program’s (UNEP’s) Global
Environment Outlook (GEO) Year Book 2003 reported 146 dead zones where marine5
life could not be supported due to depleted oxygen levels. In 2006, UNEP’s Global
Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based

3 D. Justic et al., “Seasonal Coupling Between Riverborne Nutrients, Net Productivity and
Hypoxia,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, v. 26 (1993): 184-189.
4 R. Turner and N. Rabalais, “Suspended Particulate and Dissolved Nutrient Loadings to
Gulf of Mexico Estuaries,” in Biogeochemistry of Gulf of Mexico Estuaries, T. Bianchi, J.
Pennock, and R. Twilley, eds. (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1999), pp. 89-107.
5 R. J. Diaz, J. Nestlerode, and M. L. Diaz, “A Global Perspective on the Effects of
Eutrophication and Hypoxia on Aquatic Biota” in G. L. Rupp and M. D. White, eds.,th
Proceedings of the 7 International Symposium on Fish Physiology, Toxicology, and Water
Quality, Tallinn, Estonia, May 12-15, 2003, EPA 600/R-04/049 (Athens, GA: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Ecosystems Research Division, 2004); see Box 4 at
[ ge o/yearbook/yb2003/089.htm] .

Activities reported that the frequency and intensity of coastal dead zones is rapidly
increasing and could reach 200 sites when a full list of newly identified sites is
released in early 2007.6 Hypoxia has become more frequent and widespread in
shallow coastal and estuarine areas.7 In addition, permanently hypoxic water masses
(i.e., oxygen minimum zones) occur in the open ocean, affecting large seafloor
surface areas along the continental margins of the eastern Pacific, Indian, and western
Atlantic Oceans.8
About 21% to 43% of the area of the United States’ estuaries have experienced
a hypoxic event; more than half of the affected area is in the Mississippi/Atchafalaya
River plume.9 In the Mid-Atlantic region, 13 of 22 estuaries have experienced
hypoxic/anoxic events.10 Of these, the Long Island Sound, Chesapeake Bay,
Choptank River, and the New York Bight experience the most serious annual
episodes. In the South Atlantic region, hypoxic/anoxic episodes are generally brief,11
with nearly two-thirds of this region’s 21 estuaries experiencing some hypoxia/
anoxia.12 The Gulf of Mexico region experiences the highest rate of hypoxic/anoxic
events, with almost 85% of this region’s 38 estuaries experiencing episodes of
hypoxia (including the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River plume).13 The North Atlantic
region is not as prone to hypoxic/anoxic events due to the generally low nutrient
input (the result of lower population density) and high tidal flushing. However, areas
adjacent to high population density (e.g., Cape Cod Bay and Massachusetts Bay) do
experience oxygen depletion. In the Pacific region, hypoxia also occurs near
population centers (e.g., San Diego Bay, Newport Bay, Alamitos Bay) or in areas of

6 See UNEP press release, available at [
Default.asp?Docume ntID=486&ArticleID=5393&l=en].
7 R. J. Diaz and R. Rosenberg, “Marine Benthic Hypoxia: A Review of Its Ecological
Effects and the Behavioral Responses of Benthic Macrofauna,” Oceanography and Marine
Biology: An Annual Review, v. 33 (1995): 245-303. (Hereafter referred to as “Marine
Benthic Hypoxia.”)
8 John J. Helly and Lisa A. Levin, “Global Distribution of Naturally Occurring Marine
Hypoxia on Continental Margins,” Deep-Sea Research, Part I, v. 51 (2004): 1159-1168.
9 N. Rabalais, “Oxygen Depletion in Coastal Waters.” NOAA’s State of the Coast Report.
(Silver Spring, MD: NOAA: 1998), National Picture, p. 4, [
websites/retiredsites/sotc_pdf/HYP.PDF]. (Hereafter referred to as “Oxygen Depletion in
Coastal Waters.”)
10 S. Bricker, “NOAA’s National Estuarine Eutrophication Survey: Selected Results for the
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Regions,” Estuarine Research Federation
Newsletter, v. 23, no. 1 (1997): 20-21. (Hereafter referred to as “NOAA’s Estuarine
Eutrophication Survey: Selected Results.”); NOAA’s Estuarine Eutrophication Survey, vol.
1: South Atlantic Region (Silver Spring, MD: National Ocean Service, Office of Ocean
Resources Conservation and Assessment, 1996), p. 50.
11 “Oxygen Depletion in Coastal Waters,” Regional Contrasts, p. 2.
12 “NOAA’s Estuarine Eutrophication Survey: Selected Results,” pp. 20-21.
13 Ibid., pp. 20-21.

limited circulation, even where water temperatures are cold (e.g., Hood Canal,
Whidbey Basin/Skagit Bay).14
Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone
The hypoxic zone in the northern Gulf of Mexico is the largest observed in the
estuarine and coastal regions of the western hemisphere.15 First recognized in the
early 1970s, it is the largest and most hypoxic area in the United States. The area of
hypoxia extends westward from the mouth of the Mississippi River to the upper
Texas coast.16 The seasonal shape and extent of the dead zone are mostly a function
of the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River plume, the combined outflow from these two
major rivers, and the biological processes it influences. The most reliable predictor
of the size of the hypoxic zone is the nitrate-nitrogen load in the two months before
the mid-summer mapping cruise.17 This hypoxic zone generally occurs from May to
September, but varies from year to year.
In summer 1993, following massive Mississippi River flooding, the dead zone
covered more than 18,000 square kilometers (an area as large as the state of New
Jersey); it reached its largest size in summer 2002 — 22,000 square kilometers (an
area as large as the state of Massachusetts).18 Variation in size can be substantial
between years — after reaching a maximum size of 20,000 square kilometers in

1999, the dead zone covered a much smaller 4,400 square kilometers in 2000.

Although initially predicted to be the largest in size since measurements began, the
hypoxic zone in 2007 covered about 20,500 square kilometers. However, a second
smaller hypoxic zone of about 4,500 square kilometers also developed off Texas in

2007. This second dead zone was located near Galveston south to Matagorda Bay,

and formed after runoff from heavy rains in the Brazos River drainage discharged
into the Gulf.19
Low velocity winds during the summer result in calm seas that maintain the
stratified barrier between surface and bottom water layers. Only during weather

14 “Oxygen Depletion in Coastal Waters,” National Picture, p. 5.
15 Nancy N. Rabalais, R. E. Turner, and D. Scavia, “Beyond Science into Policy: Gulf of
Mexico Hypoxia and the Mississippi River,” BioScience, v. 52 (2002): 129-142.
16 White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Committee on Environment and
Natural Resources, Hypoxia Work Group, Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Assessment Plan (March

1998), p. 3. (Hereafter referred to as Hypoxia Work Group.)

17 R. E. Turner, Nancy N. Rabalais, and D. Justic, “Predicting Summer Hypoxia in the
Northern Gulf of Mexico: Riverine N, P and Si Loading,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, v. 52
(2006): 139-148.
18 Nancy N. Rabalais, R. E. Turner, and W. J. Wiseman, Jr., “Hypoxia in the Gulf of
Mexico, a.k.a. ‘The Dead Zone,’” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, v. 33 (2002):

235-263. (Hereafter referred to as “Hypoxia, a.k.a. ‘The Dead Zone.’”)

19 Jeff Franks, “Gulf “Dead Zone” Reaches Record Size,” Reuters, August 3, 2007 [http://], and Eric
Berger, “Texas ‘Dead Zone’ is Dissipating, Houston Chronicle, August 10, 2007 [http:// ropolitan/5045528.html ].

disturbances, such as frontal passages, tropical storms, and hurricanes, does vertical
mixing of these stratified layers occur. Increased winds and frontal storms in autumn
vertically mix the water column, dissipating the hypoxia.20 In the summer of 1998,
this dead zone extended from very near shore (about 10-15 feet water depth) to
deeper waters than are normally hypoxic (as much as 160 feet deep off the
Mississippi River delta).21
Nutrient enrichment is the primary cause of eutrophication, of some algal
blooms, and of hypoxia, and is believed to be a major factor in areas such as the
northern Gulf of Mexico.22 The Mississippi watershed drains 41% of the land area
of the contiguous 48 states, including most of the farmbelt. Studies of the
Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers indicate that dissolved nitrogen levels have
tripled and phosphorus levels have doubled since 1960, fueling algal growth and the
resultant dead zone.23
Research suggests that fertilizer leaching and runoff from upriver agricultural
sources may be the main sources of nutrients. For example, USGS states that 56%
of the Mississippi River’s nutrient loading results from fertilizer runoff, with an
additional 25% of the Mississippi River nitrogen coming from animal manure
(municipal and solid wastes account for 6%, atmospheric deposition for 4%, and
unknown sources for 9%).24 Analysis of cores of sediments underlying the hypoxic
area reveals historic information on the Mississippi River watershed, indicating that
surface water productivity has increased and bottom water oxygen stress has
worsened since the early 1900s, with the most dramatic changes occurring since the
1950s — a change strongly correlated with increased use of commercial fertilizers
in the watershed.25 Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico was not an obvious or

20 In August-September 2005, the winds from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita likely promoted
a somewhat earlier dissipation of the dead zone off the mouth of the Mississippi River,
although Hurricane Cindy in early July 2005 resulted in a smaller mid-summer hypoxic zone
than expected that summer.
21 “Hypoxia, a.k.a. ‘The Dead Zone.’”
22 Hypoxia Work Group, p. 2.
23 R. E. Turner and N. Rabalais, “Changes in Mississippi River Quality This Century —
Implications for Coastal Food Webs,” BioScience, v. 41, no. 3 (1991): 140-147; R. E. Turner
and Nancy N. Rabalais, “Suspended Sediment, C, N, P, and Si Yields from the Mississippi
River Basin,” Hydrobiologia, v. 511 (2004): 79-89; R. E. Turner, et al., “Future Aquatic
Nutrient Limitations,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, v. 46 (2003): 1032-1034.
24 R. H. Meade, ed., Contaminants in the Mississippi River, 1987-92, Circular 1133 (Denver,
CO: U.S. Geological Survey, 1995), 140 pp.; D. A. Goolsby et al., Flux and Sources of
Nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin, Topic 3 Report for the Integrated
Assessment of Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision
Analysis Series No. 17 (Silver Spring, MD: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program, 1999).
25 T. A. Nelson et al., “Time-Based Correlation of Biogenic, Lithogenic and Authigenic
Sediment Components with Anthropogenic Inputs in the Gulf of Mexico NECOP Study
Area,” Estuaries, v. 17 (December 1994): 873; B. J. Eadie et al., “Records of Nutrient-
Enhanced Coastal Productivity in Sediments from the Louisiana Continental Shelf.”

widespread phenomenon prior to the early 1970s,26 but became so since then with the
advent of heavy use of artificial fertilizers and changed agricultural practices.
Several studies show a direct relationship between river-born nutrients, the high rates
of phytoplankton production, and subsequent Gulf of Mexico hypoxia.27 However,
questions remain as to how much of the river’s nitrogen might come from natural soil
mineralization, what effects floods have on nutrient transport, and how much
nitrogen may be contributed by coastal land loss, estimated at 25 square miles per
year. 28
Although studies have found that more than 70% of the total nitrogen
transported to the Gulf of Mexico by the Mississippi River originates above the
confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers,29 focusing on nitrogen runoff per unit

25 (...continued)
Estuaries, v. 17 (December 1994): 754-765; N. Rabalais et al., “Nutrient Changes in the
Mississippi River and System Responses on the Adjacent Continental Shelf,” Estuaries, v.
19 (1996): 386-407; S. Gupta et al., “Seasonal Oxygen Depletion in Continental-Shelf
Waters of Louisiana: Historical Record of Benthic Foraminifers,” Geology, v. 24 (1996):
227-230; and R. E. Turner and N. Rabalais, “Coastal Eutrophication Near the Mississippi
River Delta,” Nature, v. 368 (1994): 619-621.
26 N. Chen et al., “Historical Trends of Hypoxia on the Louisiana Shelf: Applications of
Pigments as Biomarkers,” Organic Geochemistry, v. 32 (2001): 543-561; D. Justic, N. N.
Rabalais, and R. E. Turner, Modeling the Impacts of Decadal Changes in Riverine Nutrient
Fluxes on Coastal Eutrophication Near the Mississippi River Delta,” Ecological Modeling,
v. 152 (2002): 33-46; L. E. Osterman, “Benthic Foraminifers from the Continental Shelf and
Slope of the Gulf of Mexico: An Indicator of Shelf Hypoxia,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf
Science, v. 58 (2003): 17-35; and N. N. Rabalais et al., “Ecosystem History of Mississippi
River-Influenced Continental Shelf Revealed Through Preserved Phytoplankton Pigments,:
Marine Pollution Bulletin, v. 49 (2004): 537-547.
27 F. H. Sklar and R. E. Turner, “Characteristics of Phytoplankton Production Off Barataria
Bay in an Area Influenced by the Mississippi River,” Marine Science, v. 24 (1981): 93-106;
S. E. Lohrenz, M. J. Dagg, and T. E. Whitledge, “Enhanced Primary Production at the
Plume/Oceanic Interface of the Mississippi River,” Continental Shelf Research, v. 7 (1990):
639-664; S. E. Lohrenz et al., “Variations in Primary Productivity of Northern Gulf of
Mexico Continental Shelf Waters Linked to Nutrient Inputs from the Mississippi River,”
Marine Ecology Progress Series, v. 155 (1997): 435-454; D. Justic, Nancy N. Rabalais, and
R. E. Turner, “Effects of Climate Change on Hypoxia in Coastal Waters: A Doubled CO2
Scenario fo the Northern Gulf of Mexico,” Limnology and Oceanography, v. 41, no. 5
(1996): 992-1003.
28 D. Malakoff, “Death by Suffocation in the Gulf of Mexico,” Science, v. 281 (July 10,

1998): 190-192. (Hereafter referred to as “Death by Suffocation.”)

29 R. Alexander, R. Smith, and G. Schwarz, “The Regional Transport of Point and Nonpoint-
Source Nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico,” Proceedings of the First Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia
Management Conference, Kenner, LA (December 5-6, 1995), pp. 127-133 (hereafter
referred to as “Regional Transport”); R. H. Meade, ed., Contaminants in the Mississippi
River, 1987-92, Circular 1133 (Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey, 1995), 140 pp.; D. A.
Goolsby et al., Flux and Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin,
Topic 3 Report for the Integrated Assessment of Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, NOAA
Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 17 (Silver Spring, MD: NOAA

area identifies other areas where more concentrated nutrient runoff occurs.30
Although the lower Mississippi basin (which drains parts of Tennessee, Arkansas,
Missouri, Mississippi, and Louisiana) is responsible for only 23% of the nitrogen
delivered to the Gulf, some scientists believe that nitrogen removal and/or runoff
prevention strategies should focus on this area because of its much greater relative
nitrogen contribution31 and likely more economically efficient nitrogen removal.
Researchers estimate that the benefits of nutrient controls in this lower basin could
be twice as effective as implementing them in upstream basins.32 Others dispute that
approach, believing that nitrogen removal is much more effective in small streams
(i.e., headwaters in drainages) than in large rivers. They contend that, while an area
with higher yield per area may seem like a suitable place to focus management
attention, focus should be directed to upstream areas where the total yield (regardless
of the yield per area) is greater.33 Workshops and conferences have identified
strategies for implementing nutrient controls in the lower Mississippi basin.34
Many farming interests maintain that evidence has not proven that agricultural
practices are the primary contributors to the development of the Gulf of Mexico dead
zone.35 Some farmers dispute that they contribute substantially to creating a dead
zone that is as much as 1,000 miles away. They argue that their goal is to keep as
much as possible of the applied nutrients on their land, since any nutrients that wash
away represent wasted money. On the other hand, it is estimated that as much as half
of the applied nutrients are lost to surface or ground water and to the air, resulting in
approximately $750 million in excess nitrogen (calculated as fertilizer cost) entering
the Mississippi River each year.36

29 (...continued)
Coastal Ocean Program, 1999).
30 Of this total, 39% is contributed by the upper and central Mississippi River basins (which
include Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, and Illinois), 22% by the Ohio River basin,
and 11% by the Missouri River basin.
31 Nitrogen runoff for the lower Mississippi basin is 2,072 kilograms of nitrogen per square
kilometer per year compared to 708 kilograms of nitrogen per square kilometer per year for
the upper Mississippi basin and 437 kilograms of nitrogen per square kilometer per year for
the Ohio River basin.
32 “Regional Transport,” p. 131.
33 R. B. Alexander, R. A. Smith, and G. E. Swartz, “Effect of Stream Channel Size on the
Delivery of Nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico,” Nature, v. 403 (2000): 758-761; R. B.
Alexander and R. A. Smith, “Trends in the Nutrient Enrichment of U.S. Rivers During theth
Late 20 Century and Their Relation to Changes in Probable Stream Trophic Conditions,”
Limnology and Oceanography, v. 51 (2006): 639-654.
34 For example, see C. L. Cordes and B. A. Vairin, eds., Workshop on Solutions and
Approaches for Alleviating Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, NWRC Special Report 98-02
(Lafayette, LA: U.S. Geological Survey, 1998), 53 p.
35 C. David Kelly, “Hypoxia Issue Paints a Murky Picture,” Voice of Agriculture, American
Farm Bureau (September 29, 1997), at [
focusfocus&year=1997&file=fo0929.html ].
36 “Death by Suffocation,” pp. 190-192.

Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone on Fishing. The Gulf of
Mexico supports important, easily accessible commercial and recreational fisheries,
bringing in almost $2.9 billion annually in retail sales to Louisiana and supporting
almost 50,000 jobs.37 These highly productive fisheries are the direct result of the
input of nutrients from the Mississippi River watershed. Several studies have linked
fishery effects, including declines in shrimp yields, with hypoxic episodes and areas
in the Gulf. Evidence suggests that the dead zone forces fish and shrimp further
offshore as well as into shallow nearshore areas, and reduces the area of essential38
habitat. Hypoxia increases stress on aquatic ecosystems and may decrease
biological diversity in areas experiencing repeated and severe hypoxia.39 Crowding
of marine life into restricted habitat also may lead to indirect consequences through
altered competition and predation interactions. In addition, hypoxia may delay or
impede the offshore migration of older, larger shrimp, preventing shrimp trawlers
from selectively targeting larger shrimp for harvest.
While it is unclear what specific effects the dead zone has on Gulf fisheries, the
occurrence of this dead zone may force fishing vessels to change their normal fishing
patterns, possibly expending more time and fuel to harvest their catch. One study has
concluded that any increase in fishing expenses could drive marginal operators out
of business. Other potential impacts on Louisiana fisheries include concentration of
fishing effort in other areas, resulting in localized overfishing; damage to essential
habitat, and possible decreased future production; shellfish mortality, if hypoxic
conditions impinge on barrier island beaches and coastal bay waters; localized
mortality of finfish and shellfish in shoreline areas; and decreased growth due to40
reduced food resources in the sediments and water column. The National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research,
initiated a series of research projects in the northern Gulf of Mexico in 2003 to better
understand the effects of hypoxia on fishery resources.

37 Southwick Associates, The Economic Benefits of Fisheries, Wildlife and Boating
Resources in the State of Louisiana (Arlington, VA: March 1997), 21 pp.
38 J. A. Downing et al., Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia: Land-Sea Interactions, Council for
Agricultural Science and Technology, Task Force Report No. 134 (1999), 40 p.; N. N.
Rabalais and R. E. Turner, eds., Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and
Ecosystems, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58 (Washington, DC: American Geophysical
Union, 2001), 454 p.; J. K. Craig, L. B. Crowder, and T. A. Henwood, “Spatial Distribution
of Brown Shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) on the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico Shelf:
Effects of Abundance and Hypoxia,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science,
v. 62 (2005): 1295-1308; J. K. Craig and L. B. Crowder, “Hypoxia-Induced Habitat Shifts
and Energetic Consequences in Atlantic Croaker and Brown Shrimp on the Gulf of Mexico
Shelf,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, v. 294 (2005): 79-94.
39 “Marine Benthic Hypoxia,” pp. 285-287; N. N. Rabalais and R. E. Turner, eds., Coastal
Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems, Coastal and Estuarine
Studies 58 (Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 2001), 454 pp.
40 J. Hanifen et al., “Potential Impacts of Hypoxia on Fisheries: Louisiana’s Fishery-
Independent Data,” Proceedings for the First Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Management
Conference, Kenner, LA (December 5-6, 1995), pp. 87-100; N. N. Rabalais and R. E.
Turner, eds., Coastal Hypoxia: Consequences for Living Resources and Ecosystems, Coastal
and Estuarine Studies 58 (Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 2001), 454 pp.

Because the relationship between hypoxic dead zones and populations of
commercially and recreationally important living resources is the single most
significant scientific barrier to informed management of the hypoxia problem
nationally, NOAA’s Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research convened a
symposium and workshop in March 2007.41 This meeting focused on the
effectiveness of existing approaches for evaluating the effects of hypoxia on
ecologically, commercially, and recreationally important fish and shellfish
populations in three coastal systems noted for seasonally recurring hypoxic zones —
Chesapeake Bay, the Gulf of Mexico, and Lake Erie.
Chesapeake Bay
Hypoxic conditions have been recognized in Chesapeake Bay for many years.42
In 2003, Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) scientists found a 250-square-
mile area of hypoxic water in upper Chesapeake Bay at depths below about 20 feet,
from north of Annapolis nearly to the mouth of the Potomac River.43 The low
oxygen levels were attributed to large nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient inputs,44
likely carried into the bay by runoff from above-average winter snowfall and spring
rains. This runoff was able to pick up nutrients that had accumulated in surrounding
soils during four consecutive years of dry weather. These nutrients stimulate large
summertime algal blooms in the bay, reducing dissolved oxygen in bay waters when
these organisms sink to the bottom and decompose. In 2006, the total hypoxic area
in the bay was smaller than in previous years, possibly because spring rainfall was
close to the lowest on record, resulting in less runoff and reduced nutrient input to the
bay. 45
Oregon Coast
Although permanently hypoxic water masses (oxygen minimum zones) affect
large seafloor surface areas along the continental margin of the eastern Pacific Ocean,
no dead zone events had been reported in the nearshore waters off the Oregon coast
prior to 2002. Unlike the dead zones in estuarine systems that are caused, in large
part, by excessive nutrient runoff from land, the Oregon dead zone forms along the
open coast. Coastal winds drive ocean currents that upwell nutrient-rich, but oxygen-
poor, waters from the deep sea onto the shallow reaches of the continental shelf.

41 For more information on this meeting, see [
features/fs-2007-03-16-hyp.html ].
42 Denise L. Breitburg, “Episodic Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: Interacting Effects of
Recruitment, Behavior, and Physical Disturbance,” Ecological Monographs, v. 62, no. 4
(1992): 525-546; James D. Hagy et al., “Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-2001: Long-
Term Change in Relation to Nutrient Loading and River Flow,” Estuaries, v. 27, no. 4
(2004): 634-659.
43 See the VIMS press release at [
44 For more information on nutrient input to Chesapeake Bay, see [http://chesapeake.usgs.
gov/ features.html ].
45 See “State of the Bay 2006” at [].

This upwelling of nutrients fuels phytoplankton blooms that eventually sink and
decompose to further reduce oxygen levels in the already low-oxygen waters along
the seafloor. Hypoxic zones along the Oregon coast form seasonally and can begin
in late spring/early summer in response to the onset of upwelling-favorable winds
from the north. This hypoxia can persist through the summer and ultimately recedes
during the fall when winds again shift direction and promote ocean currents that flush
low-oxygen water off the continental shelf.
In 2006, the Oregon coastal dead zone was significantly larger (more than 3,000
square kilometers), thicker, longer lasting, and lower in oxygen concentration than
in previous years, extending along the ocean floor from Cape Perpetua (Florence) in
the south to Cascade Head (Lincoln City) in the north, as close to shore as the 50-foot
depth.46 Underwater surveys of the 2006 event revealed complete disappearance of
fish from important habitats in addition to near-complete mortalities of benthic
invertebrates that are important in coastal food-webs.47 The appearance and growth
of this dead zone is attributed to fundamental, but not well understood, changes in
ocean conditions off the Oregon coast.48 The severity of the 2006 dead zone appears
to reflect (1) changes in ocean and atmosphere conditions that include the strongest
declines in offshore source-water oxygen content on record, (2) an exceptional shift
in coastal wind patterns that has greatly enhanced upwelling currents, and (3) the
persistence of low-oxygen water and phytoplankton blooms along the coast. The
extent of the developing hypoxic event in 2007 has not been determined.49 An
analogous dead zone along the open coast of Washington State may also be
While controlling upwelling-caused hypoxic zones is unlikely, increasing the
ability to predict and understand the severity and consequences of future hypoxic
events will be necessary for managing and ameliorating the social and economic
effects of ecosystem changes along the Oregon coast and beyond.
Policy and Management Efforts
Since a temporary, yet severe, hypoxic event could result in significant mortality
or injury to marine mammals, fish, and other aquatic species, many have deemed
better understanding and consistent monitoring of hypoxic phenomena necessary.
NOAA initiated the Nutrient Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity (NECOP)
program in 1989 to study the effects of nutrient discharges on U.S. coastal waters.

46 For more information, see [] and
[ ].
47 See [].
48 Brian A. Grantham, et al., “Upwelling-Driven Nearshore Hypoxia Signals Ecosystem and
Oceanographic Changes in the Northeast Pacific,” Nature, v. 429 (June 17, 2004): 749-754.
49 See [].

This study found a clear link between nutrient input, enhanced primary production
(i.e., algal and plant growth), and hypoxic events in the northern Gulf of Mexico.50
In response to a January 1995 petition from the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund
(currently known as Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund) on behalf of 18 environmental,
social justice, and fishermen’s organizations, the Gulf of Mexico Program51 held a
conference in December 1995 to outline the issue and identify potential actions.
Following that conference, Robert Perciasepe, Assistant EPA Administrator for
Water, convened an interagency group of senior Administration officials (the
“principals group”) to discuss potential policy actions and related science needs.
Subsequently, this “principals group” created a Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico
Watershed Nutrient Task Force. Additionally, the White House Office of Science
and Technology Policy’s Committee on Environment and Natural Resources (CENR)
conducted a Hypoxia Science Assessment at the request of EPA. The CENR
assessment was peer-reviewed, made available for public comment, and submitted
to the task force to assist in developing policy recommendations and a strategy for
addressing hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico.
In response to an integrated scientific assessment of hypoxia in the northern
Gulf of Mexico by the multi-agency Watershed Nutrient Task Force,52 a Plan of
Action for addressing hypoxia was released in January 2001.53 This plan’s
environmental objective is to reduce the five-year running average of the dead zone’s
area to 5,000 square kilometers or less by the year 2015. Estimates based on water-
quality measurements and streamflow records indicate that a 40% reduction in total
nitrogen flux to the Gulf is necessary to return to average loads comparable to those
during 1955-1970.54 Model simulations suggest that, short of this 40% reduction,
nutrient load reductions of about 20%-30% would result in a 15%-50% increase in
dissolved oxygen concentrations in bottom waters. Strategies selected focus on
encouraging voluntary, practical, and cost-effective actions; using existing programs,
including existing state and federal regulatory mechanisms; and following adaptive
management. A reassessment of progress on implementing this action plan was
initiated in 2005.55
A key consideration is the level and duration of the necessary reduction in
excess nutrients from watersheds. Many agricultural lands have been saturated with
nutrients for many years, and it may take a long time to “cycle out” excess nitrogen

50 NOAA, Coastal Ocean Program Office, Nutrient-Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity,
Proceedings of 1994 Synthesis Workshop (1995), p. 119; see also Estuaries, v. 17, no. 4
(December 1994): 729-911.
51 The Gulf of Mexico Program is a cooperative federal-state effort beginning after
Congress, through P.L. 102-178, designated 1992 as the Year of the Gulf of Mexico. For
additional information on this program, see [].
52 See [].
53 See [].
54 D. Scavia, et al., “Predicting the Response of Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia to Variations in
Mississippi River Nitrogen Load,” Limnology and Oceanography, v. 48 (2003): 951-956.
55 See [].

and phosphorus, even if application rates are reduced.56 While some believe this
problem may have no fast solutions and any management regime considered will
need to recognize that progress or improvement may not be apparent for years or
even decades, others suggest that improved agricultural practices in efficient
application of chemical fertilizers and prevention of soil erosion could yield
immediate and measurable benefits. One model suggests that a 12% to 14%
reduction in the use of fertilizer on croplands in the Mississippi River basin would
reduce the net anthropogenic nitrogen inputs by about 30%, without any loss in crop
production. Various policy options for modifying agriculture practices continue to
be discussed.57
Because nonpoint sources are major contributors to the problem at the mouth
of the Mississippi River system, many believe the Clean Water Act is the appropriate
legal framework for addressing future nutrient inputs. Under §319 of the Clean
Water Act, Louisiana and other states have initiated nonpoint-source58 control
programs. These programs seek to combine local, state, and federal agency resources
to address pollution from nonpoint sources within each state.59 To effectively address
concerns, however, nonpoint-source programs would need to be encouraged, funded,
and implemented throughout the Mississippi River watershed. Under §303 of the
Clean Water Act, states must identify water-quality-limited segments of their waters
that are not meeting standards, and then establish total maximum daily loads
(TMDLs) for each listed water and each pollutant (e.g., nutrients) that is not meeting
current water quality standards. In addition, agricultural research and educational
outreach/assistance to farmers might complement regulatory efforts.
Congress took note of the hypoxia problem in 1997 when the conference report
on FY1998 Department of the Interior appropriations (H.Rept. 105-337) directed the
USGS to give priority attention to hypoxia in its FY1999 budget. Near the end of the
105th Congress, provisions of the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and
Control Act of 1998 were incorporated into the Coast Guard Authorization Act of

1998. This measure was signed into law as P.L. 105-383 on November 13, 1998;

Title VI authorized appropriations through NOAA to conduct research, monitoring,
education, and management activities for the prevention, reduction, and control of
hypoxia, harmful algal blooms, Pfiesteria, and other aquatic toxins. In 2004, Title
I of P.L. 108-456, the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Amendments Act of 2004,
expanded this authority and reauthorized appropriations through FY2008.

56 “Death by Suffocation” (citing Don Goolsby, USGS, Denver, CO), pp. 190-192.
57 For example, see Suzie Greenhalgh and Amanda Sauer, “Awakening the Dead Zone: An
Investment for Agriculture, Water Quality, and Climate Change,” World Resources Institute
Issue Brief (February 2003), 24 p.
58 Originating from land use activities; sediment, organic and inorganic chemicals, and
biological, radiological, and other toxic substances are carried to lakes and streams by
surface runoff.
59 D. Sabin and J. Boydstun, “Louisiana Activities and Programs in Nutrient Control and
Management,” Proceedings of the First Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Management Conference,
Kenner, LA (December 5-6, 1995), pp. 196-198.

Legislation has been introduced in the 110th Congress to reauthorize and amend the
Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act.60
Appropriations and Funding
National Ocean Service. Hypoxia research is regularly funded through
appropriations to the National Ocean Service — part of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration in the Department of Commerce — in their Extramural
Research account under National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science.61 For FY2008,
NOAA has requested $8.9 million for extramural research grants related to harmful
algal bloom and hypoxia, including forecasting.
Department of Agriculture. In the last few years, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service has
provided a special research grant of around $220,000 annually to Iowa State
University’s Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture for a project to define and
implement new methods and practices in farming that reduce impacts on water
quality and the hypoxia problem in the Gulf of Mexico.
Environmental Protection Agency. In the last few years, the Environ-
mental Protection Agency’s Environmental Programs and Management account has
provided a specific authorization of around $125,000 annually for the Missouri
Department of Agriculture’s Hypoxia Education and Stewardship Project. This effort
seeks to educate Missouri producers about hypoxia and encourage use of practices
that will reduce the amount of nitrogen lost through leaching and/or evaporation.
The EPA has also funded research on Gulf of Mexico hypoxia through its Gulf
Breeze Laboratory

60 For additional information on action in the 110th Congress on this issue, see CRS Report
RL33813, Fishery, Aquaculture, and Marine Mammal Legislation in the 110th Congress, by
Eugene H. Buck.
61 More detail on NOAA programs and funded studies can be found at [http://www.cop. stressors/extremeevents/hab/features/hypoxiafs_report1206.html ].